art is the opposite of death

For the generation that I spend my days with, there’s not even any ideological baggage that comes along with appropriation anymore… They feel that once an image goes into a shared digital space, it’s just there for them to change, to elaborate on, to add to, to improve, to do whatever they want with it. They don’t see this as a subversive act. They see the Internet as a collaborative community and everything on it as raw material.

— Stephen Frailey, faculty at SVA, quoted in the NYTimes article, “Apropos Appropriation,” on the Richard Prince lawsuit and the limits of fair use (via austinkleon)



  1. peayeahknow reblogged this from fucknointellectualfails
  2. risingkraken reblogged this from fucknointellectualfails
  3. sageoflogic reblogged this from fucknointellectualfails and added:
    The issue with Prince’s work is that it in no way does anything of substance with the appropriated images, just slaps...
  4. fucknointellectualfails reblogged this from austinkleon
  5. paintingthewords reblogged this from austinkleon
  6. lovenat reblogged this from austinkleon
  7. loveandthetruth reblogged this from austinkleon
  8. lkincowi55cn reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  9. dasistkeinthema reblogged this from austinkleon
  10. phacade reblogged this from austinkleon
  11. moorepcc reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  12. lezparadise reblogged this from austinkleon
  13. whereipostthings reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  14. churchofpoetry reblogged this from dianebluegreen and added:
    How interesting. I’ve seen this coming on, over the last several years.
  15. salmastars reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  16. amalgamspot reblogged this from austinkleon
  17. mixed-ambivalence reblogged this from austinkleon
  18. dianebluegreen reblogged this from austinkleon
  19. ahandsomeshark reblogged this from infoneer-pulse