art is the opposite of death

Fittingly perhaps, in a case involving appropriation art, appellants’ brief is ‘post-modern,’ questioning basic concepts such as: what is a fact, and what is properly before an appellate court on an appeal?” they write. The defendants are trying to make a “revisionist” argument, they argue, by adding views of critics, museum curators, and collectors like Lisa Phillips, Nancy Spector, Douglas Eklund, and Adam Lindemann, which were not presented in the original case. (Lindemann, it should be noted, bought a painting from the “Canal Zone” series.) A sample statement that Cariou’s lawyers want the court to ignore involves Spector asserting that Price needs original works in order to “critique, dismantle, [and] transform those works

—

Patrick Cariou’s lawyers in response to Richard Prince’s appeal to the last decision.

Word to your moms, we came to drop dramz.

(via hydeordie)

1. kotidian liked this
2. amoreelegantweapon liked this
3. llorona liked this
4. lovenat reblogged this from hydeordie
5. regalmattefinish liked this
6. checkthetrends liked this
7. thestanceradness reblogged this from hydeordie
8. sexartandpolitics liked this
9. sociedademonotoma reblogged this from hydeordie
10. hydeordie posted this